Let the Scriptures Speak

Building? or Hearing?

You will do well to be attentive to it [the prophetic message],
as to a lamp shining in a dark place, 
until day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts
(2 Pet 1:19)

Atop Mount Tabor, the place identified since the fourth century as the (unnamed) “high mountain” of the Transfiguration, sits a wonderfully ironic piece of architecture. Mark says Peter suggested it from within confusion (“Rabbi, … let us make three tents; one for you, one for Moses, and one for Elijah”), and Italian Franciscans, in 1924, actually did, in stone. It is a gorgeous basilica with two side-chapels, one for St. Moses and one for St. Elijah. Though it is, with respect to the New Testament account, ironic (implementing what the text implies was a mistaken notion), the construction is nonetheless inevitable. What else would an architect do to memorialize this event?

We too must find our own way of concretizing this visionary experience of Peter, James, and John. What Jesus meant when he called himself “the Son of Man” is a topic of endless scholarly conjecture. No less an exegete than Raymond Brown thought it likely that Jesus used the title as a way of applying to himself the role of the “one like a son of man” portrayed in this Sunday's reading from Daniel 7. That means he could see himself as the one who, before the heavenly throne of the Creator, represented the “saints of the Most High”—faithful Israel—in the implementation of the reign of God.

In the glory of the vision on Tabor, Jesus is seen with the primary exponents of the Law and the prophets, Moses and Elijah, who are talking with Jesus. As the vision progresses, Moses and Elijah fade from view and a heavenly voice, last heard at the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan, says, “This is my beloved Son. Listen to him.” For the three Jewish witnesses, this vision could mean only one thing. Everything that they had listened for in the Law and the prophets—what God communicated to Israel—was now to be understood as fulfilled in the person and teaching of Jesus.
And we who identify ourselves as disciples of Jesus, how are we to make concrete the import of this vision? It gives us a way of looking at both the past and the future. With respect to the past, the Transfiguration reminds us that we, too, are descendants of those Jewish followers of Jesus Messiah who found in him everything that the Law and the Prophets taught them to yearn for. This should lead us to acknowledge contemporary Jews as brothers and sisters with whom we share a covenant never revoked, even if we understand its fulfillment differently.

With respect to the present and the future, the Transfiguration reminds us that we acknowledge Jesus to be truly risen. And we, who share with the three disciples an imperfect knowledge of what “rising from the dead” really means, can look forward to sharing this glory of Jesus as complete human beings, spirit in glorified flesh. Though we do not build three tents or three chapels, we memorialize the meaning of the Transfiguration by letting that vision guide our lives.

Dennis Hamm, SJ

Fr. Hamm is emeritus professor of the New Testament at Creighton University in Omaha. He has published articles in The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, The Journal Of Biblical Literature, Biblica, The Journal for the Study of the New Testament, America, Church; and a number of encyclopedia entries, as well as the book, The Beatitudes in Context (Glazier, 1989), and three other books.
 

**From Saint Louis University

Kristin Clauson